Obama - Nobel peace Prize ?!

I think, Obama should refuse to accept this Nobel Peace prize bestowed on him, humbly and give it to the right person who deserves it . There are many people in this world who scarified their lives to help humanity, saved lives and still going on without expecting any rewards.President Obama did so far speak lot of times about Hope & Peace but , has not proved anything yet. He should realize that he is not yet ready for the honour.This decision looks more political than genuine appreciation.By refusing and suggesting the right winner for the prize, he will be proving himself as a leader who has the courage to show flaws to then Noble Committe in its decision , and guide them in to right path.
I beleive Obama has that quality in him as he says his ideal her is Gandhiji many times. If Gandhi were given the prize when he was in Tolstoy Farm still ( which was 40 years earlier to winning Independence for India ), he would have done the same.

My comments on western media reporting on ChandraYaan

Dear Reader,Your comment is now displayed on economictimes.com. Please click here to view it on the website. And do keep writing in. Thank you, Rgds, Editor

follow the link :
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/usrmailcomment.cms?msid=3637644&usrmail=gauri_durga@yahoo.com&mailon_commented=1

Full text:


Date with moon: Chandrayaan to enter lunar orbit today
Durga,Micigan, USA,says:Did you see how the Chandrayaan launch news is reported by BBC and other US services ? They just can't stand we getting better than them ... This is what I wrote to BBC and PBS News Service ... ........... Yesterday I was listening to the BBC World News at 9 am, on my way to work, the report on Chandrayaan-1 . The reporter started it like this "India's Chandrayaan is successful but is it right for a country to do this project when so much poverty is there ?" It is very upsetting to hear this kind of comments from BBC, which is expected to have some standards and integrity in their services. I feel it is a very very inappropriate comment on India. The reporter conveniently forgot that India is one of the fastest growing economies in developing countries. It is very insulting to comment on a country which has proven its ability and self sustainability in many respects. India spent its own money in developing these missions. It is none of anybody's business to set the priorities for India. Poverty is there every where even in the US, in Africa , in China and many other countries. Then why is it always highlighted only when India achieves something significant ? India is not only self sufficient , it is also helping many other countries.If you can recollect, India gave the biggest relief fund for Katrina to US and Tsunami also, despite being hit by Tsunami . I believe, the reporters should learn to see the positives first before making the comments in the age old biased ways. They should develop a wider perspective in assessing a situation, shedding the narrow views. I hope BBC takes steps in educating their reporters to be better informed and also takes care in editing properly before broadcasting news like this. BBC owes an apology to India for making this kind of comments. 26 Oct 2008, 1104 hrs IST

Book Review - The New Global Leaders

The book “The New Global Leaders” talks about three famous European Leaders viz., Richard Branson, founder of Virgin group, Percy Barnevik, the designer of ASEAN and Brown Boveri merger and David Simon of British Petroleum. The book presents Branson as a builder who created an organization named Virgin from scratch. Barnevik is presented as great integrator who created the ultimate global organization ABB. Simon is a transformer who cured the ailing BP Company by correcting the structure of the organization.

All though all three of these leaders have apparently quite different personalities and unique styles of operations, the underlying theme of their working has been always the same – giving importance to people more than the business profit, show tolerance to failures and so on.

The major leadership qualities displayed by all these leaders are:

1. charismatic
2. agents of change
3. action oriented
4. restless and energetic
5. articulate their vision
6. build alliances and connect with people

Concepts – improving organizational effectiveness:

This book will help in many ways the existing and upcoming leaders and organizations in becoming more effective by learning various ways displayed by these leaders:

From Branson we can learn:

1. Being creative, thinking differently, out of box thinking, ready to take risk.
2. Delegating the responsibilities to sub groups thus forming the company as a federation of groups
3. Open communication, easy access to the employees. Employees can contact Branson directly with ideas and problems
4. Open mindedness to criticism

From Barnevik we can learn:

1. Being well prepared for the task to be done, doing thorough research before coming to conclusions on how to solve a problem.
2. Meeting customer needs
3. Taking action – it is better to be roughly right. Need not analyze till the last detail. In the process we may loose opportunities…
4. Respecting ethic
5. cooperating – Managers need to sort out any issues laterally instead of reaching out to vertical ( higher ) management, unless the matter is of common good for the organization. Barnevik used to fire fighting managers instead of supporting one of them. The lesson is that people should always help each other and solve the problems instead of looking for individual gains.
6. Prefers work satisfaction in employees to making money
7. Humility

From David Simon we can learn:

1. Reaching out to people at all levels , being friendly and warm

2. Listening - gathering the perspectives of various people.

3. Define the target and measure the progress

4. Understanding the culture and adopting himself to the needs.

The Strategic business planning techniques promoted by these leaders are:

1. Be lean and effective: cut down the excessive resources if needed.
2. Acquire businesses to expand across the globe.

- Barnevik acquired various companies spread across Europe in different countries that supplement or complement ASEAN’s business thus expanding the business operations.

- Branson however differed by preferring organic growth to acquisition. The Virgin group thus ventured into various innovative businesses starting from selling records to running a transatlantic airline. Employ complementary colleagues – Branson had strong executives such as Draper, Powell; Barnevik picked his own group when he joined ASEAN, by inviting many of his old colleagues from his previous job at Sandvik. Simon got Browne to his help as CEO who looks into the internal matters while he concentrates on the external matters as chairman of the BP Company.

3. Culture tolerance – Simon proved this by being successful with the conservative culture of the UK based BP where in his predecessor failed miserably by working in more American way.
4. Removing bureaucracy and decentralizing: flat structures – lateral communication rather than vertical. Operational autonomy. ABB is made up of 5000 profit centers; Branson’s Virgin consists of a number of small, autonomous units run by self managed teams.
5. Build communication - make people feel special, encourage them to be original, motivate them to perform well, reward excellence.
6. Gaining power by sharing power - empowers people, create sense of ownership.
7. Fostering shared values.
8. Continuous transformation and change.
9. Staying on top of technology and focusing on customer needs.
10. Speed – act fast and respond fast to customers, employees and any situation.

In addition to these, these global leaders also exhibited ‘social responsibility’ by creating jobs, responding to social causes like AIDS and environmental issues.

All these leaders could command respect and loyalty by not being autocratic, yet authoritative thus inspiring confidence in people. People enjoy working with them always.

A leader is the one who develops people, show them direction, and motivate them to excel who in turn become leaders in the process. And so did Branson, Barnevik and Simon.

Summary:

Overall the book makes a good reading. The narrative is interesting and informative.

The questions framed in the personal interview sounded repetitive since the same points were already narrated in the main case study.

The book is divided into three sections each discussing one global leader. The first two parts were well written giving the details of the career graphs of the leaders, their crucial points in their endeavors and their personal profile too. Where as the part three on David Simon of BP was more about the crisis in BP during the transformation period, failure of Simon’s predecessor Robert Horton and then David Simon’s takeover as CEO of BP.

David Simon’s early career and critical times which proved his leadership style were not detailed as was done in the previous parts on Richard Branson and Percy Barnevik.

The guru

The guru, mentor and a wonderfully pleasant human being.
Does n't he look like Einstein ?
white hair is missing though !

For me, he reminds me of the
ABB man Percy Barnevik
Please read my review on the book
The Three Global Leaders

Lake superior - the beautiful Michigan

With Abe !

At the Lincoln Museum
Springfield , IL

Gateway Arch - the Engineering marvel